This is a conference held once a month by the radiology department where we discuss three cases which are ideally selected by the residents. If the resident is unable to find a case, the attending will suggest a case.  We invite a pathology resident to present the path findings and the path diagnosis. 

You should discuss the clinical presentation, radiology finding, and present 3 differential diagnoses based on the radiological findings.  The pathology resident then (hopefully!) gives us the pathology answer. 

Make sure one of you contacts the pathology resident a month in advance to make sure they prepare the slides.

The pathology department’s reporting system for their studies is PathResults. To get a personal login, fill out an IT Help ticket for . You can also look up the results on PRISM. 


Presentations should be added to the appropriate folder in the H drive. The pathology powerpoint portions should also be added.

Cases should also be logged into the google doc supplied by Dr. Kagetsu:

A great outcome of a resident presentation would be to generate a case report.


 DeLara FA, Kagetsu NJ, Potter GD.  Sinonasal Cavity Metastasis from Cancer of the Cervix. AJR 161:451,1993. PMID 8333400


Once a month, two residents present an article each during a lunchtime conference to the radiology department.  An attending can assign you an article or you can find one you would like in that attending’s field. We encourage you to review your presentation with the attending before the Journal Club presentation.

The guideline format of the presentation is as follow: 

      1.  What is the article’s objective? (background/history)

      2.  What is the design of the study; e.g., Case Series, Case Control, Randomized.  Is this retrospective or prospective?  Are the controls appropriate?

      3.  Who are the subjects?  Is this explicitly stated?  Is there selection bias?

      4.  Interventions:  What procedures were performed?

      5.  Results:  What are the authors’ significant  findings?  Comment (if you can) on the appropriateness of their statistical evaluation.  Is there internal consistency in the data?

6.  Organization and writing style:  Is the paper logically organized and clearly written;  is it easy to follow?

7. Study limitations (author): summarize the limitations of the stydy as noted by the authors.

8. Additional limitations: please try to come up with your own criticisms of the paper. (you should consider touching base with the attending before your presentation for this.

      9.  Conclusions:  What are the authors’ major conclusions?  Are the results generalizable?  Are they justified from the data?  Do the conclusions support the objectives of the paper? What type of contribution to the field does this paper make?  Can you relate it to other literature on this topic? Do the results make teleological/biologic sense?

     10.  Miscellaneous Comments:  How could this paper be strengthened?  Did you learn anything from this paper?  Was the discussion informative?  Was this paper published in a major and/or peer review journal, a minor journal, or a throw-away journal? Does it help you in your practice -- will it alter practice in any way or does it support what you are currently doing???


Presentations should be added to the appropriate folder in the H drive.

A great outcome from your review would be a letter to the editor, e.g.:

YiPing Zhang M.D., Ph.D. '11
Zhang Y. Error in the calculation of the correct use of positive and negative predictive values. J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Mar;27(3):496. PMID: 18314531

Yvette Bailey M.D. '97 

Bailey YD, Cooper SG, Schur I, Patel R. Can helical CT replace aortography in blunt aortic trauma? Radiology. 1996 Nov;201(2):579-80. PMID: 8888265

Kagetsu NJ.  Inappropriate Use of Significant Figures (letter). AJR 157:645, 1991. PMID: 1872251


Review the quality measures in the hospital and then present an article that explores a quality improvement/assurance topic.

Serafin's office (administration) puts together the quality measurement slide deck.  You should receive this deck at least 24 hours before scheduled presentation.

Review deck with Dr Kagetsu or a senior resident.

You MUST correct any errors - bars used in graph are usually misaligned for e.g. or else you will hear from Dr Kagen.


Presentations should be added to Quality Improvement Conferences folder (in the appropriate year subfolder) in the H drive. Try to use a consistent file naming system.

These presentations can be converted to a presentation at a national meeting, e.g.:

Li BChoi JJEng HY, Kagetsu NJ, Manghisi S. Breast Imaging Quality Metrics Made Ridiculously Simple. (poster presentation) AUR, New Orleans, LA. April 2015.

Choi JJLi BEng HY, Kagetsu NJ, Manghisi S. Breast Density Notification Legislation: What Now and What Next. (poster presentation) AUR, New Orleans, LA. April 2015.


This is a multidisciplinary conference with clinicians and pathologists. YOU are the ONLY radiology representative there (make us proud). 

Pathology resident will email the name/mrn of the patient.
Your role is to present and review the relevant imaging findings. Depending on the findings, you may want to annotate your ppt with arrows, circles, etc to appropriately highlight the imaging findings. 


Will review the status of ongoing projects, ideas for new projects, converting presentations to publications, etc.

Before submitting an abstract, please review the submission with Dr. Kagetsu.

When an abstract is accepted, plan on presenting your presentaion at our research meeting before the national meeting.

Once an abstract is accepted, please notify all authors and Dr. Kagetsu so that our residency website can be updated. Dr. Kagetsu will not sign a travel authorization form unless this is done. 

Please submit your travel authorization form ASAP.